|
| |
Augmedium
|
| 0123 |
Augmedium™ |
Powder
for 100mL stock |
| 0124 |
Augmedium™ |
Powder
for 500mL stock |
AthenaES's Augmedium™:
Increases level
of expression
Increases
fraction of product which accumulates as
soluble protein
Available in
powder form for 100mL and 500mL of stock
Augmedium™ is a medium additive which conditions the cells prior to
induction of recombinant protein expression. This pre-induction
conditioner is designed to increase the level of expression as well
as the fraction of product which accumulates as soluble protein.
Augmedium™ is specifically intended for use with strains in which
the target protein accumulates as an inclusion body or as an
insoluble aggregate. Augmedium™ is supplied as a powder for
preparation of 50x concentrate stock solutions.
Augmedium™ Instructions
General Information
Augmedium™ is a medium additive used to
precondition cultures for improving the
expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli
which tend to form insoluble products,
inclusion bodies and aggregates. Frequently,
heterologous proteins, when highly expressed in
E. coli, accumulate as insoluble
products. The protein produced under these
circumstances is most often inactive, and,
furthermore, it can be difficult or impossible
to recover functional protein from the insoluble
material. While techniques are available for
purifying and refolding proteins which are
produced as inclusion bodies this is not always
desirable.
The role of molecular chaperones in protein
folding has been extensively studied. 1,2,3
In E. coli the two primary chaperone
networks are DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE and GroEL-GroES. In
addition to these two networks there are several
minor chaperones the expression of which are
induced when the cells are under heat, chemical
and oxidative stress. The chaperone proteins
have been proposed to interact with nascent
polypeptides and to facilitate the correct
folding. Thus, it is not unexpected that when
DnaKDnaJ- GrpE or GroEL-GroES complexes are
overexpressed the solubility of a number of
aggregationprone proteins is improved.4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14
However, not all insoluble proteins
exhibit improved solubility with overexpression
of DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE or GroEL-GroES. Moreover, it
has been shown that the solubility of some
proteins is increased when the cells are
subjected to chemical, thermal and oxidative
stresses before expression of the insoluble
protein.15,16,17,18 Therefore, it
seems likely that other chaperones may be
necessary for some proteins. However, the
mechanism by which a given protein is recognized
by any given chaperone protein is not known.
Augmedium™ was thus designed to induce the
expression of several different chaperone
proteins thereby allowing for an improvement in
the solubility of aggregate-prone proteins
without the need for identifying a specific
chaperone effector.
Preparation of a 50x Stock Solution
Dissolve the contents of the 100 mL packet or 500
mL packet in 100 mL or 500 mL deionized water,
respectively. Sterilize by filtration. Store at 4°C
for near-term use and -20°C for long-term use.
Instructions for Using Augmedium™
To Determine the Optimum Level of Augmedium™
| 1. |
Inoculate 10 ml Turbo Broth
or Turbo Prime Broth™ medium
supplemented with the appropriate
antibiotics with a single colony of the
expression strain and incubate overnight at
37°C. |
| 2. |
Use the overnight culture
to inoculate six 250 ml baffle bottom flasks
filled with 25 ml medium each. Incubate at
30°C until the density reaches an OD600 of
0.9. |
| 3. |
Add 0.5, 0.25, 0.125,
0.0625, and 0.03125 mL 50x Augmedium™ to
each of five flasks. The sixth flask is the
untreated control. Incubate 20 min. |
| 4. |
Add IPTG (or other inducer
as per the expression system) to 1 mM and
incubate for 3 hours. |
| 5. |
Harvest the cultures by
centrifugation at 3,000 xg for 20 min. Store
the pellets at -20°C or -80°C until
processing. |
| 6. |
Prepare cell-free extract
by mechanical, chemical or enzymatic
disruption. Clarify the extract by
centrifuging at 30,000 xg for 30 min.
Reserve the supernatant. |
| 7. |
Determine the amount of
soluble protein in the supernatant by one of
the following means:
a. SDS-PAGE with Coomassie or silver stain – Load equal amounts
of protein in each lane. Compare the
relative level of target protein
accumulated.
b. Immunoblot – Load equal protein
per lane of a gel or well of a slot/dot
blot. The primary antibody can be to an
affinity tag or to the target protein.
c. Functional Assay – Perform a
functional assay using equal amounts of
protein in the assay. |
| 8. |
Select the level of
Augmedium™ which yields the highest level of
target protein. |
Note: It may be necessary to perform a
time-course analysis to determine the optimum
pre-condition period for any give protein and
host/vector system.
Storage Conditions
| Dry Powder Media |
Store at room temperature |
| Liquid Media |
Store at -20°C: stable for 6-12 months |
| |
Store at 4°C: stable for 2 months |
Saftey Considerations
Handle with care. Wear appropriate laboratory
coverings. Do not breathe vapors. Consult MSDS for
more information.
References
| 1. |
Ellis, R. J. and van der
Vies, S. M. 1991. Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60:321:347. |
| 2. |
Hartl, R. U., Hlodan, R.,
and Langer, T. 1994 Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:20-25. |
| 3. |
Hendrick, J. P., and Hartl,
F. U. 1993. Annu. Rev. biochem. 62:349-384. |
| 4. |
Blum, P., Velligan, M.,
Lin, N., and Martin, A. 1992. BioTechnology
10:301-304. |
| 5. |
Caspers, P., Stieger, M.,
and Burn, P. 1994. Cell. Mol. Biol.
40:635-644 |
| 6. |
Lee, S. C., and Olins, P.
O. 1992. J. Biol. chem.. 267:2849-2852. |
| 7. |
Perez-Perez, J.,
Martinez-Caja, C., Barbero, J. L., and
Gutierrez. J. 1995. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 210:524-529. |
| 8. |
Philips, G. J., and
Silhavy, T. J. 1990. Nature 344:882-884. |
| 9. |
Amrein, K. K., Takacs, B.,
Stieger, M., Molnos, J., Flint, N. A., and
Burn, P. 1995. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
92:1048-1052 |
| 10. |
Bross. P., Andresen, B. S.,
Winter, V., Kraulte, F., Jensen, T. G.,
Nandy, A., Kalvraa, S., Ghisla, S., Bolund,
L., and Gregersen, N. 1993. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1182:264-274. |
| 11. |
Dale, G. E., Schonfeld, H.
J., Langen, H., and Stieger, M. 1994.
Protein Eng. 7:925-931 |
| 12. |
Duenas, M., Vazquez, J.,
Ayala, M., Soderlind, E., Ohlin, M., Perez,
L., Borrebaeck, C. A. K. and Gavilondo, J.
V. 1994. BioTechniques 16:476-483. |
| 13. |
Goloubinoff, P., Gatenby,
A. A., and Lorimer, G. H. 1989. Nature
337:44-47. |
| 14. |
Wynn, R. M., Davie, J. R.,
Cox, R. P., and chuang, D. T. 1992. J. Biol.
Chem. 267:12400-12403. |
| 15. |
Thomas, J. G. and Baneyx,
F. 1996. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11141-11147 |
| 16. |
Harcum, S. W. and Bentley,
W. E. 1993. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42:675-685. |
| 17. |
Schneider, E., Thomas, J.,
Bassuk, J., Sags, E., and Baneyx, F. 1997.
Nature Biotechnol. 15:581-585. |
| 18. |
Gill, R. T., DeLisa, M. P.,
Valdes, J. J., and Bentley, W. E. 2001.
Biotech. Bioeng. 72:86-95. |
|
Augmedium™ Case Studies
Augmedium™ is a medium additive used to
precondition cultures for improving the
expression of recombinant proteins in E. coli
which tend to form insoluble products, inclusion
bodies and aggregates. Frequently, heterologous
proteins, when highly expressed in E. coli,
accumulate as insoluble products. The protein
produced under these circumstances is most often
inactive, and, furthermore, it can be difficult
or impossible to recover functional protein from
the insoluble material. While techniques are
available for purifying and refolding proteins
which are produced as inclusion bodies this is
not always desirable.
The role of molecular chaperones in protein
folding has been extensively studied, (1),
(2), (3). In E. coli the two
primary chaperone networks are DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE
and GroEL-GroES. In addition to these two
networks there are several minor chaperones the
expression of which are induced when the cells
are under heat, chemical and oxidative
stress. The chaperone proteins have been
proposed to interact with nascent polypeptides
and to facilitate the correct folding. Thus, it
is not unexpected that when DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE or
GroEL-GroES complexes are overexpressed the
solubility of a number of aggregation-prone
proteins is improved. (4), (5), (6), (7),
(8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14).
However, not all insoluble proteins exhibit
improved solubility with overexpression of
DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE or GroEL-GroES. Moreover, it
has been shown that the solubility of some
proteins is increased when the cells are
subjected to chemical, thermal and oxidative
stresses before expression of the insoluble
protein. (15), (16), (17), (18).Therefore,
it seems likely that other chaperones may be
necessary for some proteins. However, the
mechanism by which a given protein is recognized
by any given chaperone protein is not known.
Augmedium™ was thus designed to induce the
expression of several different chaperone
proteins thereby allowing for an improvement in
the solubility of aggregate-prone proteins
without the need for identifying a specific
chaperone effector. Below are two case studies
where Augmedium™ was used.
The first case was an esterase from Vibrio
cholera. This protein was expressed using
pQE31 (Qiagen) with an N-terminal His tag in the
strain M15. The protein accumulated to a large
extent as an inclusion body with little of the
protein accumulated in a soluble form. To
increase the recovery of soluble enzyme, we
first examined the effect of culture medium. A
medium screen was performed according to the
protocol of the Medium Optimization Kit™
(AthenaES). Soluble protein was determined by
measuring the level of enzymatic activity
present in cells extracted with Y-Per Buffer
(Pierce Chemical). It was found that the amount
of enzyme activity recovered was
medium-dependent and that Hyper Broth™ yielded
the highest level of enzyme activity (Fig. 1).
This was in contrast to LB (Miller) Broth where
no enzymatic activity was detected.
To determine whether Augmedium™ could improve
the recovery of a protein in a medium giving
poor expression, expression of LypA was induced
in cells grown in Power Broth. This medium gave
a low but measurable level of activity (Fig. 1).
The effect of Augmedium™on LypA activity was
examined by culturing the cells in 25 ml of
medium to a density of 1.0 OD600 and
adding Augmedium™ to the culture at five
different concentrations 20 min. prior to adding
IPTG to 1 mM. After 3 hours incubation, the
cells were harvested and the soluble enzyme
released using 1 ml Y-Per Buffer (Pierce
Chemical). LypA activity was measured and the
specific activity determined. A dose-dependent
increase in enzyme activity with increasing
Augmedium™ concentration was observed (Fig. 2).
The Augmedium™ at a concentration of 2.5x
increased the yield of soluble esterase 5-fold
over the non-treated culture.
In another example, AES8 (the functional
properties of the protein can not be disclosed
at this time due to its proprietary status), a
somewhat more complex expression pattern was
observed. As above, a screen of six medium
formulations (Medium Optimization Kit™,
(AthenaES) was used to determine the one
yielding the highest level of soluble protein
accumulation. Maximum levels of active protein
in the soluble fraction were found when the
cells were cultured in Glucose M9Y™ though the
fraction of soluble AES8 protein produced
remained less than 10% of the total
accumulated. To increase the amount of soluble
protein, the Augmedium™ concentration was
titered in a matrix experiment (fractional
factorial design) along with different IPTG
concentrations and induction times. For this
protein, both an enzyme assay and immunoassay
were used to determine the level of soluble
protein.
With regard to enzyme activity, a time- and
Augmedium™ dose-dependent (“pre-condition”)
increase in protein accumulation was found (Fig.
3). Maximum activity was achieved after 6 h
induction with 0.53 mM IPTG and 1x Augmedium™.
With respect to AES8 mass accumulation (as
measured by immunoblot), there appeared to be an
interaction between the IPTG and Augmedium™ with
maximum accumulation at the extremes of the
dosing range and minimum in the mid-range doses
(Fig 4.). These findings suggests that some
portion of the protein that accumulates is not
active. Therefore, when interpreting data on
the production of a given recombinant protein
caution is advised against basing conclusions
solely on mass accumulation data.
Figure 1. Medium-dependent accumulation of
LypA after induction of expression.
Figure 2. Augmedium™-dependent increase in
LypA activity. IGP – isogenic parent showing
endogenous esterase activity. Samples were 3 h
post-induction.
Figure 3. The increase in AES8 activity as
a function of Augmedium™ concentration and induction
time.
Figure 4. Accumulation of AES8 as a
function of Augmedium™ and IPTG concentrations.
Sheldon E. Broedel, Jr., Ph.D.
Chief Science Officer, AthenaES™
February 2004
References
| 1. |
Ellis, R. J. and van der
Vies, S. M. 1991. Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60:321:347. |
| 2. |
Hartl, R. U., Hlodan, R.,
and Langer, T. 1994 Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:20-25. |
| 3. |
Hendrick, J. P., and Hartl,
F. U. 1993. Annu. Rev. biochem. 62:349-384. |
| 4. |
Blum, P., Velligan, M.,
Lin, N., and Martin, A. 1992. BioTechnology
10:301-304. |
| 5. |
Caspers, P., Stieger, M.,
and Burn, P. 1994. Cell. Mol. Biol.
40:635-644 |
| 6. |
Lee, S. C., and Olins, P.
O. 1992. J. Biol. chem.. 267:2849-2852. |
| 7. |
Perez-Perez, J.,
Martinez-Caja, C., Barbero, J. L., and
Gutierrez. J. 1995. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 210:524-529. |
| 8. |
Philips, G. J., and
Silhavy, T. J. 1990. Nature 344:882-884. |
| 9. |
Amrein, K. K., Takacs, B.,
Stieger, M., Molnos, J., Flint, N. A., and
Burn, P. 1995. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
92:1048-1052 |
| 10. |
Bross. P., Andresen, B. S.,
Winter, V., Kraulte, F., Jensen, T. G.,
Nandy, A., Kalvraa, S., Ghisla, S., Bolund,
L., and Gregersen, N. 1993. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 1182:264-274. |
| 11. |
Dale, G. E., Schonfeld, H.
J., Langen, H., and Stieger, M. 1994.
Protein Eng. 7:925-931 |
| 12. |
Duenas, M., Vazquez, J.,
Ayala, M., Soderlind, E., Ohlin, M., Perez,
L., Borrebaeck, C. A. K. and Gavilondo, J.
V. 1994. BioTechniques 16:476-483. |
| 13. |
Goloubinoff, P., Gatenby,
A. A., and Lorimer, G. H. 1989. Nature
337:44-47. |
| 14. |
Wynn, R. M., Davie, J. R.,
Cox, R. P., and chuang, D. T. 1992. J. Biol.
Chem. 267:12400-12403. |
| 15. |
Thomas, J. G. and Baneyx,
F. 1996. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11141-11147 |
| 16. |
Harcum, S. W. and Bentley,
W. E. 1993. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42:675-685. |
| 17. |
Schneider, E., Thomas, J.,
Bassuk, J., Sags, E., and Baneyx, F. 1997.
Nature Biotechnol. 15:581-585. |
| 18. |
Gill, R. T., DeLisa, M. P.,
Valdes, J. J., and Bentley, W. E. 2001.
Biotech. Bioeng. 72:86-95. |
|
|
|