Client Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
MN, Dr. Julio Fernandez, Principal Investigator
This work was published in the Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, USA in 1999.
(See Carrion-Vazquez M., A.F. Oberhauser, S.B.
Fowler, P.E. Marszalek, S.E. Broedel, Jr. J.
Clarke, and J.M. Fernandez. 1999. Mechanical and
chemical unfolding of a single protein: a
comparison. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
96(7):3694-3699.)
Engineering a polyprotein
The atomic force microscope (AFM) is a remarkably
simple instrument. Originally used for measuring
surface contours of individual molecules, it has
provided important information about the structure
of proteins. In the force-measuring mode, AFM is
capable of measuring forces down to piconewtons and
can resolve force changes caused by the displacement
of its probe by a fraction of a nanometer1.
Single molecule measurements are routinely done (see
Fisher et al. for a review2). Since
measurements can be made on many individual
molecules in a short period of time, a statistical
evaluation of the measurements can be performed.
Perhaps the most powerful aspect of AFM is that the
measurements can be done in an aqueous environment,
allowing for the study of biological material under
conditions that resemble those in vivo. The folding
and unfolding of the protein can be studied in the
presence of substrate, product, and co-factors. The
temperature can be controlled as can the buffer
conditions, i.e., ionic strength, pH, solvents, etc.
The AFM functions like a miniature phonograph. A
sharp tip mounted on a cantilever interacts with the
sample, causing minute deflections that can be
calibrated as a force. The design of our AFM is
shown in Figure 1. An example of how we have applied
AFM to the analysis of a protein is described in
detail below. In a typical experiment, the protein
sample is placed on a gold-coated cover slip that is
attached to a piezoelectric positioner. We
engineered recombinant proteins so that one end (the
C-terminus) is anchored to the gold substrate.
Random segments of the protein (titin) are then
picked up by adsorption to the AFM tip and stretched
for up to several hundred nanometers (Dzp,
Fig. 1B). When the protein is stretched, it pulls on
the cantilever causing small cantilever deflections
(Dzc) that can be converted into units of
force using the cantilever spring constant, kc
(Fig. 1C). As the protein is stretched the force
increases in a non-linear (non-Hookean) fashion;
this is the energy required to decrease the degrees
of freedom of the polypeptide (an entropic-spring
behavior that is a common property of polymers). If
the protein is further stretched the probability for
the unfolding of individual domains becomes higher.
When a domain unfolds, the AFM tip travels back to
its resting position and the force goes back to zero
(Fig. 1B and 1C).
Figure 1.
A) Schematics of our custom built atomic
force microscope. The AFM was constructed using a
Digital Instruments (DI, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) AFM
detector head (AFM-689) mounted on top of a Physik
Instrumente (PI; Waldbronn, Germany) single axis
piezoelectric positioner. The PI positioner has a
capacitative sensor resulting in a Z axis resolution
of 0.1 nm (P-732.ZC). The data acquisition (Force)
and the voltage control of the movement of the
piezoelectric positioner (Dzp) are done
by means of a PC-mounted data acquisition board
(AT-MIO-16X; National Instruments) and controlled by
custom made LabView (NI) software. The spring
constant, kc, of each individual AFM tip
(Si3N4 tip NPS, DI) is
calibrated in solution, before each experiment. Kc
varies between 30-120 mN/m. The force is measured by
the deflection of the cantilever and the extension
can be calculated from the piezo travel (Dzp).
B) Stretching and unfolding Ig-type domains
with AFM. 1) shows an unstretched polypeptide with 4
Ig domains adsorbed to an AFM tip; 2) the stretching
of the protein requires force and this is monitored
as a deflection of the cantilever; 3) the unfolding
of a domain increases the protein length, relaxing
the cantilever back to its resting position.
C) Idealized force-extension curve for the
stretching of a multi-domain polypeptide and the
subsequent unfolding of a single domain. The numbers
correspond to the stages marked in B.
Construction of a polyprotein is necessary
because the mechanical properties of a single module
could not be studied using current AFM techniques. A
single module is only 89 residues and will extend
only for a short distance. The length of a single
domain falls into a region where we always observe a
large amount of non-specific interactions between
the AFM tip and the substrate (<30nm). In contrast,
tandem repeats of many modules extend well beyond
the region of nonspecific interactions and generate
periodical patterns that amplify the features of the
individual modules and allow for a high
signal-to-noise ratio. One of the aims of our
research has been to reduce the interference from
non-specific interactions.
Recombinant DNA techniques were used to construct
direct tandem repeats of a single Ig domain from I
band titin (I27). Two methods were employed to
synthesize and express recombinant multimers of I27,
with similar results. One of them was a multiple
step cloning technique modified from a previously
described method3 that makes use of four
restriction sequences (BamHI, BglII, SmaI and KpnI )
to build even multiples of I27. This approach adds
two new amino acids (Arg and Ser) to the I27
sequence such that the repeated monomer becomes
[I27-RS]n. Using this method we have
constructed a protein composed of eight tandem
repeats (I27RS8 , Fig. 2).
Figure 2.Construction of poly-I27
proteins.
A) Agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide
showing the size of the I27-RS multiples (right
lane).
B) Coomassie blue staining of the purified
I27RS8 protein (~90 kDa)
separated by SDS-PAGE.
C, D) Summary of the sequence of the I27RS8
and I27LG11 constructs.
The second method was based on single step
cloning of high order multimers into a custom-made
expression vector4,5. This method relies
on a single type of restriction site, AvaI, to build
linear multimers of the I27 monomer. The AvaI
sequences add two new amino acids (Leu and Gly) to
the I27 sequence such that the repeated monomer
becomes [I27-LG]n. Using this method we
constructed a protein composed of eleven tandem
repeats (I27LG11, Fig. 2D).
Expanding on this theme, we have since constructed
polyproteins for the titin domains I28 through I34
including an alternating I27-I28 construct. Each was
expressed in E. coli, purified by Ni-affinity
chromatography, and subjected to AFM analysis.